#104743 - Tue Jan 18 2005 01:35 PM
Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Wed Jan 30 2002
Posts: 1464
Loc: Jp
|
On the Now page, sometimes they are posting info http://www.snowjapan.com/e/daily/shownow.php?town=Hakuba%20Now%21 From this week. Avalanche Advisory With the huge amounts of snow and wind this past week Avalanche Hazard is high in the alpine bowls above tree line. Bellow tree line the hazard is moderate yet caution needs to be taken in open convex terrain. Be careful in steep unsupported terrain over 30 degrees. There are multiple slab avalanches that can be seen in the Hakuba mountains that were of a very large size (size 3 ~ size 4). Some close to 2 metres deep, 500 metres in width and 1 km in length. In other words HUGE. Small sluffs can be seen in steep terrain below tree line and there is increased chance of small slab avalanches on southern aspects with increased solar radiation and increased temperatures. Have fun, Play safe. Always wear a beacon, carry rescue gear and know how to use it just in case. Ride one at a time with other members of your crew watching from safe areas and when possible stay out of avalanche terrain.
_________________________
genki na aisatsu shimasho!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104744 - Tue Jan 18 2005 03:49 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Who writes these things? Isn't that the first thing you want to know?
The priorities in that list of avuncular advice at the end are exactly backwards aren't they? (Not that I would know, I haven't taken a course.)
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104746 - Tue Jan 18 2005 04:36 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Sorry Fattwins, I understand exactly what he's talking about. But you can tell from the way it's written that there's an element of self-importance there (in width = wide, in length = long), and I also find it odd that anybody would trust unaccredited warnings.
And you don't think that advice is backwards?
As for your own reliability, judging from your recent posts, I wonder just how safe you are.
I just find some of the BC stuff funny that's all. And I know how much ya'll hate to be laughed at.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104747 - Tue Jan 18 2005 05:02 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Tue Jan 29 2002
Posts: 1356
Loc: yuzawa--tokyo
|
Surprised to see you posting here Ocean11. I thought you had renounced all winter-sports to pursue a more green existence.
The reason I had suggested a dedicated forum was to encourage others to share info about safety/avie in regards to Japan. I'm looking forward to any useful information you might have to share with us here.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104749 - Tue Jan 18 2005 05:28 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Alright, ignore my question then if you can't answer it.
I haven't done the necessary course so I wouldn't know, but is that saying that it's maybe not safe to ride on steep, south facing slopes in-bounds too? Because if that's what it's saying, it should maybe say so, if you know what I'm saying.
montoya, I'm sure I have no information of use to you, but I'll feel free to ask questions here from time to time. Just to educate myself if'n I do get back into it.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104751 - Tue Jan 18 2005 06:25 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 75+ posts
Registered: Wed Feb 11 2004
Posts: 99
Loc: Sapporo
|
I'd actually have to agree with Fatty on this one. Ocean's, I've read only two threads about avo's on this site (one on avo courses, and then this one), and you've made ill-informed comments that denigrate both.
The danger is that others, who are new to the BC or avo awareness, may not take the good information onboard. Questions are good. Derisive comments from an uninformed position are dangerous for others.
_________________________
It's all fun and games until someone is strangled in your friend's kitchen.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104752 - Tue Jan 18 2005 06:35 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 75+ posts
Registered: Wed Feb 11 2004
Posts: 99
Loc: Sapporo
|
Oh, and I forgot.... "self importance"? Sheesh! Informing others with the aim of reducing fatalities doesn't rate as 'self importance' in my book.
And there isn't anything that suggest the author was rating the advice in the last paragraph in any order of priorities. Take it for what it is: great info to have that'll help you make sesible (and hopefully) life saving decisions.
Whew! I usually don't get hot in forums, but I'll take all the avo information I can get thanks.
Here's a big thanks to anyone out there sharing info - those here, or those I meet on the hills.
_________________________
It's all fun and games until someone is strangled in your friend's kitchen.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104753 - Tue Jan 18 2005 06:41 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er
Registered: Tue Jan 18 2005
Posts: 3
Loc: Kansai
|
But you can tell from the way it's written that there's an element of self-importance there (in width = wide, in length = long) New here, but,......Who IS this guy? 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104754 - Tue Jan 18 2005 07:11 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
> If you skied 100 slopes lets say 50 of them would slide. How do you want to write that up
"You have a 50% chance of being involved in a possibly fatal slide on certain southern slopes including in-bounds"?
Or again, did I misread that?
If that's really the case, and the concern really is safety, why not say that?
> The danger is that others, who are new to the BC or avo awareness, may not take the good information onboard Patronizing nonsense. The danger is that some people may take all this 'good' information on board, do stupid things on the hill, write posts listing their mistakes 1 through 4 (in all objectivity), then make 1 mistake too many. A more plausible danger methinks ... speaking strictly as an armchair theorist.
> New here, but,......Who IS this guy? Someone who thinks the BC people on here (except miteyak) are funny.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104756 - Tue Jan 18 2005 08:16 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Fattwins, I don't want a pat on the back from you. I'd likely end up in a creek.
The bone I have to pick is that I think a lot of this is just a bit of a pose. A lot of the 'BC community discussion' is tripe. Don't give me crap about "the writing is standard within the industry". I translate specifications for a living and that is not some 'industry standard' format there (it's an attempt to be which is what makes it funny).
Besides poking a bit of fun, I've asked a few simple questions here, but nobody responds to the serious questions because you cain't. You just patronize, or hint that I should FO, but if you knew what you were talking about you could give me an answer without saying "Phone Dave Enright".
Is that Hakuba warning actually warning about dangers within resorts or not? And if it is, why isn't it clearer like some 'industry standard' warning ought to be? Do you really think something like that can form the basis of decision making? If people are really taking the time to go out there and check up on this, it seems like an awful waste of time just to write something half-arsed like that report. Posting something vague like that, and then saying "be sure you know how to use your kit now" seems more like an infomercial to me.
Ah whatever, jes tryin' t'edicate myself here's all.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104759 - Tue Jan 18 2005 08:38 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Ha ha, that's funny. What is the topic? SJ, if there isn't an avalanche advisory for a place, does that mean there aren't going to be any avalanches there? Gosh, others, who are new to the BC or avo awareness might think that. 
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104761 - Tue Jan 18 2005 08:48 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Tue Jan 29 2002
Posts: 1356
Loc: yuzawa--tokyo
|
is there a reason why a cancer like O11 is still allowed to post here? just a simple answer will suffice.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104763 - Tue Jan 18 2005 08:50 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
Fattwins, you know just enough to gab about it a lot. Whether I ride or not has got nothing to do with it, as you well know.
I think they're informercials and nothing more, but hey, if you want to base your decisions on them go right ahead. :that waving smiley:
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104764 - Tue Jan 18 2005 08:53 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 500+ posts
Registered: Sun May 18 2003
Posts: 503
Loc: Yokohama
|
I hate to even bring myself to reply to the fool, but.... informercials for what exactly???
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104765 - Tue Jan 18 2005 09:00 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
cancer ... warning ... fool very polite. SJ moderation hitting a new low here.
Infomercials for Hakuba BC courses.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104766 - Tue Jan 18 2005 09:34 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Wed Jan 30 2002
Posts: 1464
Loc: Jp
|
Well I never thought it would turn out like this. Can't you just give it a rest?
Ocean11, what do you get out of this? Do you just get kicks out of doing all you can to cause a fuss out of nothing or what?
If I cared I would truly feel sorry for you.
_________________________
genki na aisatsu shimasho!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104767 - Tue Jan 18 2005 10:09 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 3000+ posts
Registered: Fri Sep 13 2002
Posts: 3850
Loc: London
|
I think you should shut down the site completely. It is obviously an informercial for winter sports in Japan, and that is just not acceptable. It's OTT blatant. And it should stop, NOW! 
_________________________
Everything's going to be just fine, she said
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104768 - Tue Jan 18 2005 11:29 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 2000+ posts
Registered: Fri Jul 06 2001
Posts: 2478
Loc: Ye olde Hakuba
|
Originally posted by Ocean11: I haven't done the necessary course so I wouldn't know, but is that saying that it's maybe not safe to ride on steep, south facing slopes in-bounds too? Because if that's what it's saying, it should maybe say so, if you know what I'm saying.
The report states that danger is high above the tree line. In the Hakuba valley, only the very top part of Happo resort is above the tree line. The top course there is not steep, faces east and is on a ridge (the "one" of Happo-one). For those of you interested, the men's downhill in the 1998 Olympics started halfway up this top course. The wooden starting gate lower down was for the womens race. Everything else at the other resorts in the valley is below the tree line. The only resort I can think of with a steepish south facing course would be Cortina. Off the ridge to skiers left down to the main course. Cortina's main steeps face north. Happo's steeps face east. 47 and Goryu's face east/north east. Tsugaike has no steep courses. Iwatake's short steeps face east and appear to be closed. If you leave the courses, every resort has south-facing steeps. Last week, a long crown fracture, i.e., the wall of snow left where the snow cracks during a slab avalanche, could be seen on Norikuradake above and behind Tsugaike. I saw it from Iwatake, 10km away. As the report says, that's going to be huge. On the whole, I wouldn't be so concerned about infomercials for avalanche courses because there is no real money in them. Just as there is no money in guiding if you don't take people to the biggest lines on the one day of the season they can go there. Safety-first doesn't pay.
_________________________
"The toe is the Achilles' heel of the foot."
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104769 - Wed Jan 19 2005 07:18 AM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 7500+ posts
Registered: Thu Mar 01 2001
Posts: 9732
Loc: Matsuyama
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104771 - Wed Jan 19 2005 08:08 AM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Wed Jan 30 2002
Posts: 1464
Loc: Jp
|
SJ moderation hitting a new low here. Yes, why isn't Ocean11 banned?
_________________________
genki na aisatsu shimasho!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104773 - Wed Jan 19 2005 01:02 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 10000+ posts
Registered: Wed Jul 17 2002
Posts: 11140
Loc: is everything
|
Originally posted by montoya: Surprised to see you posting here Ocean11. I thought you had renounced all winter-sports to pursue a more green existence.
Hes a closet wannabe BC skier 
_________________________
what did you poach today?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104774 - Wed Jan 19 2005 01:43 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 75+ posts
Registered: Wed Feb 11 2004
Posts: 99
Loc: Sapporo
|
I think we've all made our points. Let's just let it rest and let this new avo section get back on track, survive, and thrive. I don't think any of us (wherever you stand in this - and I'm not excluding myself) is achieving anything by dragging it on.
I'm voting with the moderator. Give the section a chance by letting it all rest.
_________________________
It's all fun and games until someone is strangled in your friend's kitchen.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104775 - Wed Jan 19 2005 10:42 PM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Thu Nov 08 2001
Posts: 1400
Loc: Takarazuka
|
I'm more than happy with the backcountry conditions notices available on this site. Concerning Hakuba in particular they make perfect sense to me because I'm familiar with the areas being talked about. I can also understand most of the terminology and descriptions used. They're what you'll read in texts and what you talk about with other skiers/boarders.
Great clarification posted there MrWiggles. I would take any advisory indicating a high degree of danger on South facing steep slopes above the treeline as a caution for similar areas anywhere below the treeline, onpiste or not. On piste is generally controlled by the resort and they may close areas for this reason. There are plenty of off piste danger areas as desribed in the advisory accessible by skiing right off the lifts eg Tsugaike South faces or the Goryu gondela area. Right now I wouldn't go anywhere like that, I'd stick to tree-lined slopes more-or-less.
Doing a certified avalance awareness course didn't make me an expert, a pointy-headed know it all, or the member of some exclusive club of high-noters. It did however make me think twice about the safety of what I was doing. It was a bargain,and one of these days I'll do the same two days again as the refresher componant of a five day advanced course. I doubt the courses ever make a huge amount of money, but if they did it'd be well deserved earnings.
I think I know sweet #### all about the very important topic of riding safely. Wearing a beacon and all the knowledge in the world can become a moot point once you're buried. That's one of the first things you learn if you read a book or do a course on the subject. Anyway SJ, keep the reports coming and the information flowing.Cheers.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104776 - Thu Jan 20 2005 10:09 AM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er with 5000+ posts
Registered: Thu Apr 04 2002
Posts: 5691
Loc: near enough Tokyo
|
I agree with the folks here, please post what you can.
(So, was anyone banned?)
_________________________
Some people believe football is a matter of life and death. It is much, much more serious than that
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#104778 - Thu Jan 20 2005 11:19 AM
Re: Hakuba avalanche advisory
|
SJ'er
Registered: Thu Nov 13 2003
Posts: 17
Loc: J
|
yeah cheers for the info
_________________________
I like skiing. Oh, and chicks too.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SnowJapan Chat Box is currently closed.
|
|
|
18 Registered (cab_D, contender, Endless Winter, Go Native, golf74, Hotaka Scott, Indo, jetpilot000, me jane, MikePow, Mr Wiggles, Mudguts, NPM, shadowtec, snowhunter, stemik, 2 invisible),
86
visible guests and
15
others. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
7220 Members
11 Forums
16172 Topics
295584 Posts
181 Average daily posts (last week)
78 Posts in the last 24 hrs
Max Online: 2075 @ Fri Apr 04 2008 09:23 AM
|
|
|