#356897 - Fri Mar 12 2010 06:50 PM
Big families
|
SJ'er with 500+ posts
Registered: Sat Sep 14 2002
Posts: 679
Loc: Nagano
|
So, do any of the people here come from a big family? I's call big when we are getting to there being more than 3 children? I have never really been too keen to get a family started and still aren't really. I certainly would not want many children myself I don't think, but I was wondering if many people who do end up with big families start off wanting that or if it often just turns out that way. I know one of my friends now has 4 children and she has always wanted that - she couldn't be happier (though does NOT want number 5!). Another friend was quite upset when she got pregnant for the third time unexpectedly and that really caused a lot of problems in her marriage too. 
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#356903 - Fri Mar 12 2010 07:03 PM
Re: Big families
[Re: charlotte]
|
SJ'er with 5000+ posts
Registered: Sun Nov 04 2007
Posts: 5298
Loc: Perth Western Australia
|
I am the eldest of three and the only girl. Papa is the middle of three and the only boy (although a surprise half brother older than all of them turned up a few years ago). I had always envisaged having 2 daughter. Papa had always envisaged breeding his own footy team with no daughters amongst them. The first was planned at 22, we had been married two years, and we were well and truly ready. People always told us we were 'older' than our ages. That was '92 19 months later we had our second son, in '93. We were not planning any more at that time, but I fell pregnant and miscarried twice, so it become a bit of a psycho nutcase obsession to have that 3rd child. We eventually succeeded in '97 - another boy. He was gorgeous, but a bit of a handful, a busy boy. And the other two were just starting school. So we decided My Three Son's was it. I went back to Uni, and was juggling a toddler, two little school aged kids and study when I discovered I was pregnant again.  I cried my eyes out. But that 4th boy, born in '99 has been an absolute joy. They all have in their own way. I certainly could not imagine life without them. I don't think I really had planned to have a large family, but I am glad it worked out that way.  But I must say our family is not large compared to Papa's oldest sister .... she has TEN! And the oldest is only twelve.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#356937 - Sat Mar 13 2010 07:49 AM
Re: Big families
[Re: gareth_oau]
|
SJ'er with 2000+ posts
Registered: Sun Jun 18 2006
Posts: 2966
Loc: Australia
|
I think having 4 boys is just sensational, apart from the food bills
 My 7 year old boy eats 3 times more than my 10 year old daughter. I don't know how you fit it all in a shopping cart.
_________________________
The older I get. The better I was.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#356947 - Sat Mar 13 2010 12:34 PM
Re: Big families
[Re: Go Native]
|
SJ'er with 500+ posts
Registered: Mon Dec 29 2008
Posts: 736
Loc: Perth, Australia
|
GN, I've got 4 kids and think its great, but if I (or wife) wasnt able to have kids, I wouldnt obsess like some people do.
my wife hasnt worked for over 20 years now, but if we had no kids, I have a strong suspicion we'd be multi-millionaires by now, with an incredible, different life.
kids seem a be-all, end-all obsession for some, but I think, wheteverever you are dealt with, make lemonade.
Acquaintences of ours - the wife had around 10 miscarriages, and methinks nature was perhaps offering some hints?
their obsession continued and they eventually mortgaged themselves to the hilt and tried the invitro-route, and delivered a set of twins.
these twins are far from perfect, and will be a fulltime carers job for the rest of their lives
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#356975 - Sat Mar 13 2010 08:03 PM
Re: Big families
[Re: Go Native]
|
SJ'er with 2000+ posts
Registered: Sat Nov 24 2007
Posts: 2757
Loc: Tamworth, Australia
|
I just get told by so many other parents that we should at least have one more. That it's so much easier as they can play with each other and it's really good for them to have a sibling or two. I've known a few single child kids who didn't seem to turn too bad at all. Just wondering if anyone else was a single kid. Did you feel you really missed out on anything not having brothers or sisters? I had one sister and frankly we were never that close. Reckon I would have been happy to be an only child! Not a single child, but with a sister 3 years my junior, I can attest that there's lots of "friendly" fighting goes on. We are now quite close, but there were years when we spoke not a single word to each other. There were also lots of childhood arguments and some quite serious events that were the result of our fighting. From what I've seen, it is better to have 2 than 3 (there is almost ALWAYS a 2 against 1 scenario happening with 3 kids) but I'd not be without my sis now (took me 50 odd years to get to that point but!)
_________________________
"The pure and simple truth is rarely pure and never simple." Oscar Wilde
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#357006 - Sun Mar 14 2010 04:48 PM
Re: Big families
[Re: gareth_oau]
|
SJ'er with 1000+ posts
Registered: Wed Jun 12 2002
Posts: 1445
Loc: Fukushima
|
Anything more than 5 and its just getting silly. I think people should need a license to have kids. 
_________________________
music is only good if you like it
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#357009 - Sun Mar 14 2010 05:18 PM
Re: Big families
[Re: Mamabear]
|
SJ'er with 5000+ posts
Registered: Sun Nov 04 2007
Posts: 5298
Loc: Perth Western Australia
|
GN: there is an inordinate amount of singletons in my youngest son's class. I think part of the reason is he started at his private school at the earliest possible age (the other boys were all there - made sense to us to keep them all together) ... but most often people start their kids older. So the cohort is skewed a bit (normalizing a bit now that he is in Year 5 and there are about 6 times the starting number). I found the singletons on the whole, and as a group, younger and more babyish, although some had a HUGE knowledge base. They tended to have difficulty sharing toys, and not dominating discussion, or the opposite ... finding their voice in the hustle and bustle of a group. The children from large families were always more robust both physically and mentally.
5 years down the track I see the cry baby not sooking so much, the kids that just would NOT shut up, able to let someone else speak, and the quiet kid in the corner standing up and contributing his 2c worth to the class discussions. So yes, sometimes singletons don't get the same experiences in socializing and skills associated with being in groups before they get to school...but they do fine. I woud recommend taking your daughter to play groups, and getting together with friends with kids her age regularly.
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 Registered (1, @tokyo, BagOfCrisps, best skier in hakuba, big-will, BlackpoolTower, bobby12, brit-gob, Captain Stag, CptSlow, DumbStick, fukdane, golf74, grungy-gonads, gurningBob, HighlyTrainedExNovaTeacher, iiyamadude, Indo, Jynxx, Mantas, mina2, MitchPee, muikabochi, oo, panhead_pete, RobBright, SantaCruz, Schneebored, Shinkor, SJ-Pete, SKI, stemik, Tex, veronica, yamayamayama, yoroshiku onegai shimasu, 4 invisible),
189
visible guests and
50
others. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
8198 Members
13 Forums
19090 Topics
374647 Posts
118 Average daily posts (last week)
109 Posts in the last 24 hrs
Max Online: 1967 @ Tue Jan 12 2010 03:12 PM
|
|
|